TWITTER UPDATES: DESANTIS, MUSK, AND MACRON.

 

Desantis today says if students want to study “niche majors” they can go to schools like Berkeley, but FL colleges are now going to solely focus on “the basics.”

MY RESPONSE:

By Basics, he means whatever Hitler, Stalin, Putin, Trump.,etc would approve of. Well Florida Democrats, if you still exist, are you going to fight back now?

Podcast leader:

Top Witness in the Biden Family Corruption Investigation Goes MISSING

MY RESPONSE:

This is the kind of manure ELON MUSK SAYS PROMOTES FREE SPEECH. GOP CANNOT PRODUCE A NAME, A FACE, OR ANY EVIDENCE THAT SUCH A PERSON EVER EXISTED, BUT HE'S MISSING. COMER AND THE FASCIST GOP HAVE THEIR HITLERIAN ALLIES IN PLACE, SELLING OUT THE U.S.

President of France.

Emmanuel Macron

@EmmanuelMacron

With

@ElonMusk

, we talked about the attractiveness of France and the significant progress in the electric vehicle and energy sectors. We also talked about digital regulation. We have so much to do together. See you this afternoon at the #ChooseFrance Summit!

MY TWO RESPONSES:

What a proud moment for France, the President meets with one of this country's most prominent FASCISTS. Forgetting about the past is something that is present even in countries that suffered from the decisions made by the same type of Individual who they now embrace in friendship.

Good for you President Petain, er I mean Macron.

TO THOSE WHOSE SENSE OF DUTY MEANT MAKING THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE.

 "...whether on the scaffold high or in the battle's van, the fittest place for man to die is where he dies for man."

MICHAEL JOSEPH BARRY.

A REAL MAN? GIVE ME A BREAK.

 Here is something posted by Josh Hawley on the Internet.

I responded with this: 

Josh "Light the match, and run away like a Worthless Coward" Hawley is giving advice on what it means to be a man? Are you kidding? What's next? Trump giving us advice on why we should always tell the truth? FOX is not just a propaganda tool for fascism, but a promoter of Vile...

For those of you who may have forgotten what I am referring to, here is a Video reminder.

https://youtu.be/ByWvdGJ8CwM

FACT CHECKING TRUMP, AND ANYONE ELSE. PART 3.

Too often we allow our Feelings, Prejudices, Pre- Conceived Ideas, and Physical and Emotional Desires to lead us to draw conclusions that, Logically, are Invalid or not Proven to be Factual.

This, of course, is an error in Judgment anyone can make. Progressive or Conservative, Democrat or Republican, Well Informed or Ignorant. etc No one is immune to the Intellectual and/or Emotional Satisfaction of being Right or Vindicated in what they believe to be true.

The Problem is what one does when faced with contradictory Facts or Arguments that indicate that their Conclusion(s) are in error.

To make this easier to understand, let us examine two BASIC TYPES OF LOGICAL ARGUMENTS.

VALID DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT: IF THE PREMISES ARE TRUE, THE CONCLUSION MUST BE TRUE. This establishes Conclusions that cannot reasonably be considered to be incorrect.

EXAMPLE:

PREMISE 1- Human Beings cannot survive in an environment where water is not present.

PREMISE2: Planet X is barren of any water supply.

CONCLUSION: Mankind cannot survive on Planet X.

As you can see, if we provide enough factual data that both premises are True, the Conclusion itself must be accepted as true.

So, when someone asserts something as Truthful, and you disagree, your first question should not be similar to the following:

"Your wrong, because I learned/Heard/Read something that proves you are incorrect."

That in itself usually leads to dueling opinions, because your contradictory statement must also be properly argued.

Try this instead: "That is interesting. Tell me what Data or Facts lead you to believe that to be true?"

Now you are not contradicting the speaker, but are forcing them to:

- Offer a Validly constructed argument. 

- Create premises that support the conclusion they are making, each of which also must be defended as true.

In the above example of Planet X, the conclusion that Mankind cannot live on Planet X rests solely on both premises being true, and that there is satisfactory Data that cannot be refuted that proves the accuracy of both premises.